Author Interview Synopsis & Transcript

            For my Author Interview, I decided to call my older sister, Meghan Johnson, and ask her about her recent publication. Meghan, currently pursuing a PhD from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, is an aspiring school/clinical psychologist who recently wrote and defended her thesis in a conference in San Diego. The ~50 page article called, “Evaluations of a Bullying Case Involving a Student with Autism Spectrum Disorder,” was published in the Journal of Applied Social Psychology (pub: 2015 vol. 45), the premier academic journal for social psychologists.

Conducted with the help of her research professor, the study evaluated responses to different bullying situations in a university setting; in the experiment, test subjects listened to a recording of a disciplinary committee deliberating over a case wherein a victim of bullying was either autistic, dyslexic, or not diagnosed with any disorders in an effort to determine how bullying of autistic students affects students. Meghan, who has worked with kids & students with various disabilities since she was 14, felt passionately about the subject and was thankful she got the opportunity to conduct this experiment with all the resources and support needed for it to be successful.

Overall, Meghan thought the process of publishing was challenging, yet rewarding. The entire process took about a year and a half from start to finish, with the majority of that time spent negotiating the peer review/revision process after the paper was already completed. Meghan found the scientific, structured nature of the writing to be relatively easy to produce—there are strict guidelines for academic papers in scholarly journals, so for her, it was more a matter of doing the necessary research and completing the different sections on time rather than perfecting her prose and creating an interesting piece of writing. In regards to the future of academic writing, Meghan feels as though not much will change in the “digital age;” new research will continue to come out, it will “just be a more streamlined process to access it.” Meghan hopes to conduct and publish one more experiment before receiving her PhD, although given how busy she is with work and school, she feels as though it will be unlikely unless she is brought on as a paid research assistant.

Below is a typed transcript of our conversation highlighting the main points of her responses to each question as the interview unfolded. Our conversation was over an hour and a half long, and admittedly, we had a tendency to stray from the interview questions from time to time, so I made a judgment call and elected to transcribe the relevant information rather than include the long recording.

1.     Who or what inspires you as an author?

- “The student populations I’ll be serving as a school psychologist. I’ve been working with kids with disabilities forever now and I’ve always wanted to work in schools, so this experiment was kind of a natural intersection of those two motivations.”

2.     Who or what motivates you as an author?

      - “I’m motivated to find answers to questions as a researcher and social psychologist; I think writing finds connections, interpretations, and evaluations that can’t be discovered just by reading other articles, so it’s important to consolidate that information in writing even if the topic itself seems super specific. All published information contributes to the overall wealth of knowledge on the subject, and I guess I wanted to give back? It's cool to be a part of this community of smart people all interested in the same subjects as me.”

3.     What author[s] or book[s] influenced you as an author the most?

- “Well, the writing I do now is different than what influenced me originally back in my ‘school-school’ days—if I was writing creatively, I’d definitely point to Master and Margerita as my biggest influence. I love the style, I love the content—the book brings me to a new place.”

4.     Most often, where, when, and how do you write?

      - “I write in my office, on the computer, or at home on the couch when the office gets too boring, although Mav (her cat) is really bad for my productivity… I tend to write in bits and pieces rather than all at once. It can be kind of draining to actually sit down and write some of this dense information, and I think my writing could be called scatterbrained. It’s just like how I tell stories.”

5.     How is technology changing print culture, specifically regarding authors and readers?

      - “For research, everything is almost entirely online these days… I mean, I could get journals in paper, but everything I researched for this paper was online in databases… I think textbooks on computers will take over paper textbooks soon too… I prefer reading on paper, but the portability and accessibility of the Internet just makes it way easier to have it all online. Do I think this is a good change? Well it definitely increases accessibility, which I suppose helps more people in the long run, but I think it takes away from the traditional aspects of reading, which I’ve always loved.

6.     When you write, who is your intended audience?

- “My audience would be readers of peer reviewed journals in psychology, other researchers, or people who like scientific literature. It’s a pretty particular topic in a pretty particular location—I wouldn’t call it light reading, that’s for sure.”

7.     How is the current technological revolution changing your audience?

- “It expands the audience by making other articles more accessible; I noticed this happen all the time during my research, where I’d find myself going on tangents and discovering new and interesting research I never planned on looking up. It’s much easier to click a link and discover this whole wealth of knowledge on a topic than it was 20 years ago when everything was in paper. I think this’ll have a big impact on my audience—unintended researchers will just happen to stop by my article like I did to theirs. I think it’s great.”

8.     What do you think reading and authorship will look like fifty years from now?

- “In terms of research-based literature, it will look pretty similar… I think it’s always pretty much been the same, it’s just more streamlined now given how accessible everything is. But for ‘normal’ authors, I think there will be much more pressure to adapt to the Internet and get the next new bestseller. There’s already a huge discrepancy between those who ‘made it’ and those who haven’t, and I think it would be a tough career path to enter that’ll only get more difficult in the future.”

9.     How did you find a publisher, and how long did that process take?

- “So generally speaking, my article went through a peer review process, and I waited about a year for it to finally be published… I submitted it in July 2014, and I had a couple journals in mind for publication, but the one that picked it was the target the whole time which was really great… You definitely don’t want to submit to more than one in case they both get accepted. I thought about that idea too but my research professor told me I’d get in HUGE trouble if that problem came up… Once it gets to the peer review process, there are a few options—it can either get accepted right away and published, it could be accepted with some minor revisions, it could get denied but given the option to fix the problems and send it back, or it could be just plain rejected… I got the 2^nd option—one reviewer told me to shorten it a bit and take out some of the research on one topic, and another reviewer told me to expand the research on a different topic. It’s pretty rare to get accepted on your first publication on your first try though, so I was really happy with how it all played out.”

10. How much did your manuscript change during your publisher’s editorial process?

- “So it was too long originally. The final paper was a bit shorter, by about 5 pages or so. Two of my peer reviewers had minimal comments, like I said—one wanted more information on one aspect of the study, and one wanted a better definition for a certain thing. I’d call it tweaking—there were no major additions or subtractions to the original manuscript.”

11. Do you have a definite and specific organization and structure in mind as you begin writing?  If so, how definite and specific is your outline?

      - “Research articles in journals, and this one in particular, have a very specific structure and organization… There’s also APA standards for writing and formatting along with the journal’s standards… Basically, everything was in a prescribed format, down to the length of paragraphs and sections… All I really had to do was make sure I met all the criteria for each of the necessary sections, which helped a lot with keeping it all focused and on topic.”

12. How would you describe your writing process? 

      - “Well because it was a thesis, there were deadlines for specific sections, so each section could get the consideration it needed from my research professor. I was always on a time crunch… It was scientific, but I mean I also had a big emotional involvement with it all because it was my thesis.”

13. Do you have any writing habits or rituals that help your wiring process?

      - “I write really well under pressure, so I would tend to procrastinate… Yeah nothing’s really changed there since high school… There was definitely a controlled chaos to the procrastination though—I didn’t let it get too out of hand, just used it to motivate me to get it all done. I don’t know why I still put myself through so much misery when I write. Also, I did a ton of research, so it helped me to begin with an organization of the relevant information… I mean I referenced over 50 articles in my paper, so organizing it all was a necessity.”

14.  Do you write in multiple genres?

      - “I’m not published in any other genre… I’ve done writing throughout my academic career, but just typical student writing. Essays and stuff. I’ve always liked [non-scientific writing], but I don’t really have time for it anymore.

15. Besides teaching and authorship, have you had any other jobs in the writing field?

- “For my Masters program, I was a TA in undergrad research methods, so I had to teach students how to write research articles. You should have called me for that one you had to write!”